UFOs And New Frontiers:
Connecting With The Larger Reality - Part 1/5

by C.B. Scott Jones, Ph.D. 1994

Introduction

The last speech in this collection is perhaps the most important of the group. The reason for this statement is that this 1994 talk is focused on what may be the government's dilemma in trying to handle UFO phenomena.

In some respects it is a tough speech, and probably upsetting to parts of the intelligence community. I have enough enemies as it is, and do not want to cultivate any more than I have to while moving through life. However, the issue of excessive government secrecy is critical to the survival of democracy. This is one issue that is worth risk taking.

You will note that in the talk I link a particular aspect of UFO phenomena, mind influence and mind control, with a earth-based capability in the same area. More is known about the earth-based capability than the reported UFO capability. The point is this, when the full earth-based capability in this area is known to the Congress and the American public, it should be an adequate wake-up call to get serious about the dialog on UFO phenomena.

If Congress wants to continue to dodge its responsibilities concerning UFO phenomena, perhaps it will want to look under the rock that covers our nation's activity in mind control technology.

Matrix Of UFO Belief

The main thrust of the Foundation's involvement in the UFO field has been a low key approach to the current administration, encouraging it to review the policy it inherited concerning secrecy about UFO phenomena, and urging it to change the policy to one of openness -- sharing with the American public and the world what special knowledge it may have on the subject.

I suspect most of you know, there is a world of opinions about UFO phenomena, but we could not identify any body of evidence that would be generally accepted as proof of any hypothesis concerning that phenomena. We felt, therefore, that it would be helpful to have a starting point for discussion that generally defined, in summary, where we are on the subject. We were not seeking a consensus of belief, but rather a statement about the spectrum of beliefs. Personally I think that there currently is only one reasonable consensus: there is not sufficient information in the public domain to support a logical and rational belief structure. I also believe that *somewhere* there is enough information to support a logical and rational belief structure concerning what we call UFO phenomena. I don't want to disappear into a semantic fog, but it would probably take a good deal of effort to get agreement on what exactly is considered to be "UFO phenomena." I know for sure that we have our labels wrong. The issue is not Unidentified Flying Objects: discs, triangular, cigar or other shaped craft. That is at best merely one possible manifestation of what we really are interested in. Abduction phenomena is another poor and misleading label. Again, I suspect that it is another manifestation of a more encompassing phenomena that so far no one has been smart enough or bold enough to identify. I'll give it a try later because it is one of our Matrix entries.

The UFO Matrix of Belief presents the spectrum of scenarios found in current literature which are used to explain so-called UFO or ETI activity, or the lack thereof. Each matrix item has a supporting constituency. Some of these constituencies are quite vocal and apparently confident that the data with which they are familiar are adequate to support their belief systems in these areas. Others are less vocal, but no less confident that their current belief structures are the most reasonable, given the data which are generally accepted. There most certainly is a large minority which is not willing to commit to one matrix entry over another, or in combination, until additional data are available. The following are Matrix of Belief entries which purport to explain UFO phenomena.

1. All sightings except for a small minority which lack detail can be explained in terms of naturally occurring phenomena.

2. The phenomena are explained by craft from off planet, but from the visible universe.

3. The phenomena are explained by interdimensional penetrations by other intelligences or life-forms, based in or operating from another (parallel) overlapping dimension than our own time-space.

4. The phenomena are explained by earth-based "others," referenced throughout history, who may be other lifeforms, or predominately resident in realms or dimensions we term spiritual.

5. The phenomena are explained by hoaxes or dramatic scenarios perpetrated by various intelligence organizations as part of broader security or disinformational campaigns.

6. The phenomena are broader social engineering, or population mind-influencing programs designed to promote a more universal planetary consciousness and to reduce the influence of nationalistic or religious traditions.

7. The phenomena are examples of technologies springing from multi-dimensional science, either Earth-based and surrounded by a bodyguard of lies, and/or non-Earth-based but rejected by most as outside the current scientific paradigm.

8. The phenomena are any combination of the above, including "all of the above." Intent: unknown.

1. There is no government activity inasmuch as the phenomena are explained by naturally occurring events.

2. The government is aware, but not directly involved or in contact with the perpetrating forces.

3. The government is in contact to some degree, and cooperating with at least some of the source-phenomena or intelligences, either for technology trading or because government believes it has no choice.

4. The government is the perpetrator of at least some of the phenomenology, perhaps drawing on the source experience for ideas and methods, but employing the events for other purposes such as intelligence, disinformation, or to alarm other nations.

5. At least some UFO phenomena are results of government or other agency sponsored experiments in mind-control, or social control experiments or initiatives.